Hey Introvertibrate
I've been following you on You Tube and am a believer of back EMF but i don't know enough to know the truth from false. I came across this video, can you comment?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_rvJQb2SDY
Thanks
Free Energy Developer's Forum
Forum for the discussion of Free Energy Devices
| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to The Free Energy Developer's Forum.
This forum has been set up for the discussion of Free Energy Devices primarily foucsed on easily reproducable devices. I would like this forum to be a useful starting point for anyone beginning their projects so that the subject of free energy may be more commonly understood and recognised with easily reproducable projects and experiments. I set up this forum primarily to post the answers to commonly asked questions. I'm afraid I don't have much time to participate in discussions but feel free to join www.energeticforums.com if you need more help. |
|
Back EMF?
2 posts • Page 1 of 1
by Introvertebrate on Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:27 am
That's a video by Aaron, the author of the Quantum Key... he is very knowledgable in the bedini circuits and many other "free energy" devices.
Though I think he has made that video over complicated. What he is trying to say is the term Back EMF is inaccurate. There are many terms in this science which are incorrectly used and Back EMF is the one often used to describe how bedini's devices work.
As Aaron says, Back EMF is a force that opposes the current flow while the coil is becoming energised. Though we can not use this force to charge batteries!
The correct term is "Flyback Voltage". The video is 100% correct. after the coil has become energised and the current is then disconnected the magnetic field collapses and creates a high potential between tht top and bottom of the coil that can go into the hundreds of volts. This is Flyback Voltage, not Back EMF.
The confusion began when Bedini was applying for his patent on the monopole. The patent assessors weren't satisfied with his explanation as to how the batteries are charging and so for the patent to be passed he had to change the wording to something more acceptable.
All I can say is those assesors were a bunch of dumbasses!
Though I think he has made that video over complicated. What he is trying to say is the term Back EMF is inaccurate. There are many terms in this science which are incorrectly used and Back EMF is the one often used to describe how bedini's devices work.
As Aaron says, Back EMF is a force that opposes the current flow while the coil is becoming energised. Though we can not use this force to charge batteries!
The correct term is "Flyback Voltage". The video is 100% correct. after the coil has become energised and the current is then disconnected the magnetic field collapses and creates a high potential between tht top and bottom of the coil that can go into the hundreds of volts. This is Flyback Voltage, not Back EMF.
The confusion began when Bedini was applying for his patent on the monopole. The patent assessors weren't satisfied with his explanation as to how the batteries are charging and so for the patent to be passed he had to change the wording to something more acceptable.
All I can say is those assesors were a bunch of dumbasses!
-
Introvertebrate - Site Admin
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 9:43 pm
2 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Donate Now
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Hosted by FreeForums.org | Create a free forum